Category Archives: SS15

Seminar, SS15

These are the requirements and outline for writing a review:

  • Reviewer information
    • Lastname,Firstname, Mail adress
  • Reviewers Experience
    • 1-5 (1 never heard about that before, 5 I’m an expert)
  • Rating
    • +3 to -3:
      • +3 = Strong accept
      • +2 = accept
      • +1 = weak accept
      • 0 = borderline (I don’t care, let the others decide)
      • -1 = weak reject
      • -2 = reject
      • -3 = strong reject
  • Evaluation
    • Short summary,
      • 3-4 sentences, approx. length of an abstract
    • Content:
      • some paragraphs (depends on length of paper), (bullet-point style is ok)
      • Understandable?
      • Enough (8-10 pages, more is ok)?
      • The paper should either provider a good overview OR should be focused on a dedicated subject.
    • Well written?
      • 1-2 sentences (depends on length of paper)
      • examples for bad phrases
    • Layout, format
      • 1 -2 sentence
  • Optional: Comments for the PC (will not be sent to the authors)
    • Some sentences
    • Things you want the program committee to know, e.g.
  • Important: Deadline for reviews is Friday, 26th of June, 11:59 p.m. Later submission will result in a deduction of points.