These are the requirements and outline for writing a review:

• Based on these review examples:
  • BspReview1
  • BspReview2
• Reviewer information
  • Lastname,Firstname, Mail adress
• Reviewers Experience
  • 1-5 (1 never heard about that before, 5 I’m an expert)
• Rating
  • +3 to -3:
    • +3 = Strong accept
    • +2 = accept
    • +1 = weak accept
    •   0 = borderline (I don’t care, let the others decide)
    • -1 = weak reject
    • -2 = reject
    • -3 = strong reject
• Evaluation
  • Short summary,
    • 3-4 sentences, approx. length of an abstract
  • Content:
    • some paragraphs (depends on length of paper), (bullet-point style is ok)
    • Understandable?
    • Enough (8-10 pages, more is ok)?
    • The paper should either provider a good overview OR should be focused on a dedicated subject.
  • Well written?
    • 1-2 sentences (depends on length of paper)
    • examples for bad phrases
  • Layout, format
    • 1 -2 sentence
• Optional: Comments for the PC (will not be sent to the authors)
  • Some sentences
  • Things you want the program committee to know, e.g.

Detailed information will be given at the event on Monday, 13th of January 2014.

Important: Deadline for reviews is Friday, 27th of June, 11:59 p.m. Later submission will result in a deduction of points.